When compared against the $1,699 Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM, the smaller, lighter f/4 model holds its own.. In fact the two perform at a similar level. The faster lens is a better performer at 35mm but the 17-40mm has more uniform sharpness across the field and marginally higher peak sharpness (albeit at different settings between them, and a difference of 1P-Mpix is trivial in real world Canon EF 35mm F1.4 II USM. General info. Optics. Aperture. Focus. Benchmarks. 89 points. vs Add to comparison. $1,079. Sony FE 90mm F2.8 Macro G OSS. 3 Sony FE 16

The Canon EF 85mm f/1.2L II USM ($2,199 direct) ($1,999.00 at Amazon) is one of two f/1.2 lenses in the Canon library, and like the EF 50mm f/1.2L USM ($1,349.00 at Dell) it's one without a peer

UBQuQc2.
  • w5ne243fn5.pages.dev/255
  • w5ne243fn5.pages.dev/206
  • w5ne243fn5.pages.dev/378
  • w5ne243fn5.pages.dev/451
  • w5ne243fn5.pages.dev/201
  • w5ne243fn5.pages.dev/313
  • w5ne243fn5.pages.dev/376
  • w5ne243fn5.pages.dev/355

    • canon ef 16 35mm f 2.8 l iii usm test